The field of language and occupation has yielded numerous studies on the various ways language is used in work settings. One notable researcher in this area is Almut Koester, renowned for her work on spoken discourse in the workplace. In this article, we will begin by defining key terms to establish a foundational understanding of the topic. Then, we will delve into Koester's 2004 study, "Relational sequences in workplace genres," examining its purpose, methodology, and findings - particularly in relation to phatic talk and banter. Finally, we will discuss the practical applications of this research for the language and occupation. Along the way, we will also explore real-life examples of phatic talk to enhance our understanding.
Before we delve into Koester's research, it is essential to have a clear understanding of some crucial terms.
Phatic Meaning: Phatic communication, also known as small talk, is used for social purposes, rather than conveying information or ideas.
Phatic Communication: This type of communication focuses on building and maintaining relationships. It may include greetings, discussions about weather or traffic, and other non-work-related interactions. In the workplace, this involves any conversation that is not related to work. For instance:
This exchange between Tom and Julie demonstrates the use of phatic communication for socializing, rather than work-related purposes.
Phatic communication is also known as phatic talk, phatic expressions, or small talk. Banter, a form of playful teasing, is a subset of phatic communication.
There are 12 types or functions of phatic communication, including:
Each of these functions serves to strengthen or maintain social relationships and does not have a purpose beyond being social.
Here are some examples of the various types of phatic communication mentioned above:
By understanding phatic talk and banter, we can effectively navigate social interactions in the workplace, fostering meaningful relationships that can have a positive impact on our professional lives.
In order to maintain a harmonious and comfortable atmosphere in the workplace, it is crucial to prioritize positive relationships among colleagues. Effective communication plays a vital role in achieving this, as it involves expressing empathy, respect, and friendship. This article will delve into various strategies for fostering a positive and harmonious workplace environment.
The most common type of communication in the workplace is transactional talk, where the focus is on accomplishing specific tasks and goals. For instance, discussing a project or arranging a meeting with coworkers. Let's take a look at an example of transactional talk:
This type of conversation is purely functional, with the purpose of organizing a meeting. It involves exchanging information to arrive at a solution.
In addition to transactional talk, social interactions also play a crucial role in workplace communication. This is known as phatic talk, which involves building and maintaining relationships with colleagues through brief conversations. In 2004, Koester conducted a study on the use of phatic and transactional talk in the workplace.
Prior research has demonstrated that workplace communication primarily revolves around task-oriented interactions, but phatic talk is also present. Koester's study focused on the shorter units of phatic talk in workplace conversations and their patterns. The data was collected from three different types of professional work environments in the UK and the USA.
The study revealed that in workplace conversations, phatic talk occurred when participants shared a goal. This was evident in four different levels of interaction: non-transactional conversations, phatic communion, relational episodes, and relational sequences and turns. Let's delve into each level in further detail.
To sum it up, Koester's study highlights the significance of both phatic and transactional talk in the workplace. By understanding and utilizing these types of communication, a harmonious and comfortable atmosphere can be fostered in professional interactions.
While conducting transactional interactions, phatic communication involves the small talk and banter at the start or end of the conversation. This type of communication aims to establish a sense of social connection between the participants rather than just focusing on the task at hand.
Relational episodes, on the other hand, occur throughout a transactional interaction. This includes instances of small talk, office gossip, and banter that may arise while discussing a task. For example, while planning a meeting, there may be a brief diversion into gossip before returning to the task at hand. The key difference between phatic communion and relational episodes is their placement within the conversation. Phatic talk usually occurs at the beginning or end of a conversation, while relational episodes can happen at any point.
For example:
The above conversation may seem purely transactional, but the office gossip and small talk included can also fall under the category of relational communication.
Gossiping is just one of the many functions of phatic talk, as discovered in Koester's research.
These are conversations where the main focus is on building social relationships, but there is also a task-related element present. For instance, chatting about weekend plans while working in the office, occasionally touching upon work but primarily focusing on social aspects.
Koester's study revealed that in workplace interactions, people simultaneously aim for both transactional and relational goals. This means that relational communication, small talk, and banter are crucial in effective transactional conversations and are intertwined in the structure of workplace interactions. For example, starting and ending a transactional conversation with small talk, and including a joke or a bit of gossip in the middle.
Koester's research also identified some regular patterns in the occurrence of relational and phatic talk, including:
This study highlights the importance of phatic communication in workplace interactions, a crucial aspect often overlooked by language and occupation theories that only focus on transactional conversations.
Koester's research has direct relevance in the field of language and occupation, particularly in conversation analysis. It provides insight into the presence of phatic talk and banter in workplace conversations and emphasizes the significance of fostering a social aspect in the workplace environment.
While workplace communication is often focused on achieving tasks and completing projects, it's essential to recognize the role of phatic and relational talk in fostering strong relationships among colleagues.
Phatic communication, also known as small talk, may seem like idle chatter, but it serves a crucial purpose in creating a sense of camaraderie and social bonds within the workplace. This type of communication includes topics like greetings, the weather, or social plans, which may not be directly related to work.
In addition to strengthening relationships, phatic talk also helps to create a more positive work environment. By engaging in small talk and banter with colleagues, employees can cultivate a sense of trust and mutual understanding, leading to better teamwork and productivity.
In conclusion, while task-oriented communication is essential, it's vital to also recognize and value the role of phatic talk and banter in building and maintaining workplace relationships. By incorporating these elements into daily interactions, employees can foster a more positive and productive work environment for all.
